In 2021, Johnson & Johnson (J&J) was ordered to pay $2.12 billion to 22 women who claimed their ovarian cancer was caused by asbestos in the company’s talcum powder products. This verdict, originally $4.7 billion, was reduced on appeal but upheld by the Missouri Court of Appeals and subsequently by the U.S. Supreme Court, which declined to hear J&J’s appeal​.

The plaintiffs in this case alleged that J&J's baby powder contained asbestos, a known carcinogen, which led to their development of ovarian cancer. Despite internal documents and investigations revealing J&J had been aware of asbestos contamination in their talc products for decades, the company continued to market these products without warning labels​.

This was a victory not just for the amazing women and their families, but a victory for justice.

Gail Ingham

One of the 22 women awarded damages | 06/01/2021

The Supreme Court's refusal to review the case adds significant pressure on J&J to settle thousands of similar lawsuits pending across the country. As a result, J&J has faced mounting legal challenges and has set aside billions for settlements. The company has also ceased selling talc-based baby powder in the U.S. and Canada since 2020​.

This decision marks a pivotal moment in ongoing litigation against J&J, highlighting both the legal and ethical responsibilities of corporations regarding product safety and consumer protection.

Read the full articles here: Yahoo ,Reuters ,Justice ,US Department of Health ,CNBC, Financial Times